An international survey of more than 2,360 scientists and researchers found that although they respect and understand the need for lab safety measures, in many cases their own lab practices often fall short.
The survey was conducted by BioRAFT, Cambridge, Mass, a developer of laboratory safety and compliance management software solutions, the University of California Center for Laboratory Safety, and Nature Publishing Group.
The survey explored a wide variety of topics surrounding lab safety.
More than 2,360 scientists and researchers completed the survey during a 6-week period in the summer of 2012. Most laboratorians surveyed work in research labs. Among other findings:
“Scientists think they’re safe, but their compliance with currently accepted best practices, along with the frequency of injuries, indicate that they’re not. This points to serious problems in how communication around lab safety and its requirements are being conducted,” says Nathan Watson, CEO of BioRAFT. “These survey results are just the beginning of a larger conversation that the scientific community needs to have to improve lab safety.”
“The results of this survey really provide a roadmap for us, determining where we need to focus our efforts to improve lab safety,” says James Gibson, executive director, UC Center for Laboratory Safety and director, UCLA Office of Environment, Health & Safety. “In the coming months we’ll be closely analyzing all of these data, continuing our mission of helping academic and commercial labs all across the world make their labs even safer.”
The survey is the first of a series of studies and projects to provide a path for establishing data-driven best practices for laboratory safety.
BioRAFT will be publishing a series of posts examining different aspects and implications of the survey.
Click here to request a copy of the lab safety survey and to view the first post on the survey.